Gupta S, Deep K, Engelbrecht AP (2020) Engineering applications of artificial intelligence a memory guided sine cosine algorithm for global optimization. Eng Appl Artif Intell 93:103718

Article
Google Scholar

Heidari AA, Mirjalili S, Faris H, Aljarah I, Mafarja M, Chen H (2019) Harris hawks optimization: algorithm and applications. Future Gener Comput Syst 97:849–872

Article
Google Scholar

Chen H, Asghar A, Chen H, Wang M, Pan Z, Gandomi AH (2020) Multi-population differential evolution-assisted Harris hawks optimization: framework and case studies. Future Gener Comput Syst 111:175–198

Article
Google Scholar

Gupta S, Deep K, Moayedi H, Foong LK, Assad A (2020) Sine cosine grey wolf optimizer to solve engineering design problems. Eng Comput, no. 0123456789

Gupta S, Deep K, Mirjalili S, Hoon J (2020) “A modified sine cosine algorithm with novel transition parameter and mutation operator for global optimization. Expert Syst Appl 154:113395

Article
Google Scholar

Wolpert DH, Macready WG (1997) No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 1(1):67–82

Article
Google Scholar

Zhou W, Wang P, Heidari AA, Wang M, Chen H (2020) Multi-core sine cosine optimization: methods and inclusive analysis. Expert Syst Appl 164:113974

Article
Google Scholar

Kerr RH, Scheidt JL, Fontanna AJ, Wiley JK (1966) Unit commitment. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 5:417–421

Article
Google Scholar

Baldwin CJ, Dale KM, Dittrich RF (1959) A study of the economic shutdown of generating units in daily dispatch. AIEE Trans Power Appar Syst. 78:1272–1284

Article
Google Scholar

Lee KD, Vierra RH, Nagel GD, Jenkins RT (1985) Problems associated with unit. Commitment in uncertainty. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 104(8):2072–2078

Google Scholar

Dorigo M, Birattari M, Stutzle T (2006) Ant colony optimization. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 1(4):28–39

Article
Google Scholar

Mirjalili S (2015) The ant lion optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 83:80–98

Article
Google Scholar

Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2014) Adaptive gbest-guided gravitational search algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 25(7–8):1569–1584

Article
Google Scholar

Yang X-S (2010) New metaheuristic bat-inspired algorithm. In: Nature inspired cooperative strategies for optimization (NICSO 2010). Springer, pp 65–74

Simon D (2008) Biogeography-based optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 12(6):702–713

Article
Google Scholar

Cohen AI, Yoshimura M (1983) A branch-and-bound algorithm for unit commitment. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 102(2):444–451

Article
Google Scholar

Nakamura RY, Pereira LA, Costa KA, Rodrigues D, Papa JP, Yang XS (2012) BBA: a binary bat algorithm for feature selection. In: Brazilian symposium on computer graphics and image processing, pp 291–297

Meng XB, Gao XZ, Lu L, Liu Y, Zhang H (2016) A new bio-inspired optimisation algorithm: Bird Swarm Algorithm. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 28(4):673–687

Article
Google Scholar

Das S, Biswas A, Dasgupta S, Abraham A (2009) Bacterial foraging optimization algorithm: theoretical foundations, analysis, and applications. Stud Comput Intell 203:23–55

Article
Google Scholar

Civicioglu P (2013) Backtracking Search Optimization Algorithm for numerical optimization problems. Appl Math Comput 219(15):8121–8144

MathSciNet
MATH
Google Scholar

Rashedi E, Nezamabadi-Pour H, Saryazdi S (2010) BGSA: binary gravitational search algorithm. Nat Comput 9(3):727–745

Article
MathSciNet
MATH
Google Scholar

Kaveh A, Mahdavi VR (2015) Colliding bodies optimization: extensions and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–284

Book
MATH
Google Scholar

Gandomi AH, Yang X-S, Alavi AH (2013) Cuckoo search algorithm: a metaheuristic approach to solve structural optimization problems. Eng Comput 29(1):17–35

Article
Google Scholar

Wang GG, Guo L, Gandomi AH, Hao GS, Wang H (2014) Chaotic Krill Herd algorithm. Inf Sci (NY) 274:17–34

Article
MathSciNet
Google Scholar

Kuo HC, Lin CH (2013) Cultural evolution algorithm for global optimizations and its applications. J Appl Res Technol 11(4):510–522

Article
Google Scholar

Mirjalili S (2016) Dragonfly algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems. Neural Comput Appl 27(4):1053–1073

Article
MathSciNet
Google Scholar

Snyder WL, Powell HD, Rayburn JC (1987) Dynamic programming approach to unit commitment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2:339–347

Article
Google Scholar

Wang GG, Deb S, Coelho LDS (2015) Earthworm optimization algorithm: a bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for global optimization problems. Int J Bio-Inspired Comput 1(1):1

Article
Google Scholar

Wang GG, Deb S, Coelho LDS (2016) Elephant herding optimization. In: 2015 3rd international symposium on computational and business intelligence (ISCBI 2015), pp 1–5

Abedinpourshotorban H, Mariyam Shamsuddin S, Beheshti Z, Jawawi DNA (2016) Electromagnetic field optimization: a physics-inspired metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Swarm Evol Comput 26:8–22

Article
Google Scholar

Ghorbani N, Babaei E (2014) Exchange market algorithm. Appl Soft Comput J 19(April):177–187

Article
Google Scholar

Ghaemi M, Feizi-Derakhshi MR (2014) Forest optimization algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 41(15):6676–6687

Article
Google Scholar

Tan Y, Tan Y, Zhu Y (2015) Fireworks algorithm for optimization fireworks algorithm for optimization, pp 355–364

Yang XS (2012) Flower pollination algorithm for global optimization. In: Unconventional computation and natural computation. Springer, pp 240–249

Rashedi E, Nezamabadi-Pour H, Saryazdi S (2009) GSA: a gravitational search algorithm. Inf Sci 179:2232

Article
MATH
Google Scholar

Kazarlis SA (1996) A genetic algorithm solution to the unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans Power Systems 11:83–92

Article
Google Scholar

Yang XS (2010) Firefly algorithm. In: Engineering optimization, p 221

Saremi S, Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2017) Grasshopper optimisation algorithm: theory and application. Adv Eng Softw 105:30–47

Article
Google Scholar

Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A (2014) Grey Wolf optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 69:46–61

Article
Google Scholar

Dai C, Chen W, Ran L, Zhang Y, Du Y (2011) Human group optimizer with local search, pp 310–320

Dieu VN, Ongsakul W (2008) Ramp rate constrained unit commitment by improved priority list and augmented Lagrange Hopfield network. Electr Power Syst Res 78(3):291–301

Article
Google Scholar

Gandomi AH (2014) Interior search algorithm (ISA): a novel approach for global optimization. ISA Trans 53(4):1168–1183

Article
Google Scholar

Atashpaz-Gargari E, Lucas C (2007) Imperialist competitive algorithm: an algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, CEC 2007, pp 4661–4667

Gandomi AH, Alavi AH (2012) Krill herd: a new bio-inspired optimization algorithm. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 17(12):4831–4845

Article
MathSciNet
MATH
Google Scholar

Karimkashi S, Kishk AA (2010) Invasive weed optimization and its features in electromagnetics. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 58(4):1269–1278

Article
Google Scholar

Shareef H, Ibrahim AA, Mutlag AH (2015) Lightning search algorithm. Appl Soft Comput J 36:315–333

Article
Google Scholar

Kashan AH (2014) League Championship Algorithm (LCA): an algorithm for global optimization inspired by sport championships. Appl Soft Comput J 16:171–200

Article
Google Scholar

Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Hatamlou A (2016) Multi-verse optimizer: a nature-inspired algorithm for global optimization. Neural Comput Appl 27(2):495–513

Article
Google Scholar

Reza Norouzi M, Ahmadi A, Esmaeel Nezhad A, Ghaedi A (2014) Mixed integer programming of multi-objective security-constrained hydro/thermal unit commitment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29:911–923

Article
Google Scholar

Sadollah A, Bahreininejad A, Eskandar H, Hamdi M (2012) Mine blast algorithm: a new population based algorithm for solving constrained engineering optimization problems. Appl Soft Comput J 13:2592–2612

Article
Google Scholar

Mirjalili S (2015) Knowledge-Based Systems Moth-flame optimization algorithm: a novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowl-Based Syst 89:228–249

Article
Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598):671–680

Article
MathSciNet
MATH
Google Scholar

Wang GG, Deb S, Cui Z (2015) Monarch butterfly optimization. Neural Comput Appl 31:1995–2014

Article
Google Scholar

Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1995) Particle Swarm Optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on neural networks, pp 1942–1948

Gupta S, Deep K (2018) A novel random walk grey wolf optimizer. Swarm Evol Comput 44:101–112

Article
Google Scholar

Husseinzadeh Kashan A (2014) A new metaheuristic for optimization: optics inspired optimization (OIO). Comput Oper Res 55:99–125

Article
MathSciNet
MATH
Google Scholar

Merrikh-Bayat F (2015) The runner-root algorithm: a metaheuristic for solving unimodal and multimodal optimization problems inspired by runners and roots of plants in nature. Appl Soft Comput J 33:292–303

Article
Google Scholar

Mirjalili S (2016) SCA: a sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems. Knowl-Based Syst 96:120–133

Article
Google Scholar

Anita JM, Raglend IJ (2012) Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm. In: International conference on computing, electronics and electrical technologies, pp 109–115

Salimi H (2015) Stochastic fractal search: a powerful metaheuristic algorithm. Knowl-Based Syst 75:1–18

Article
Google Scholar

Dai C, Zhu Y, Chen W (2007) Seeker optimization algorithm, pp 167–176

Satapathy SC, Naik A, Parvathi K (2013) A teaching learning based optimization based on orthogonal design for solving global optimization problems, pp 1–12

Cheng MY, Prayogo D (2014) Symbiotic organisms search: a new metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Comput Struct 139:98–112

Article
Google Scholar

Gonçalves MS, Lopez RH, Fleck L, Miguel F (2015) Search group algorithm: a new metaheuristic method for the optimization of truss structures. Comput Struct 153:165–184

Article
Google Scholar

Mirjalili S, Gandomi AH, Mirjalili SZ, Saremi S, Faris H, Mirjalili SM (2017) Salp swarm algorithm: a bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems. Adv Eng Softw 114:163–191

Article
Google Scholar

Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2016) The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 95:51–67

Article
Google Scholar

Baykasoğlu A, Akpinar Ş (2017) Weighted Superposition Attraction (WSA): a swarm intelligence algorithm for optimization problems—part 1: unconstrained optimization. Appl Soft Comput J 56:520–540

Article
Google Scholar

Li MD, Zhao H, Weng XW, Han T (2016) A novel nature-inspired algorithm for optimization: virus colony search. Adv Eng Softw 92:65–88

Article
Google Scholar

Zheng YJ (2015) Water wave optimization: a new nature-inspired metaheuristic. Comput Oper Res 55:1–11

Article
MathSciNet
MATH
Google Scholar

Glover F (1989) Tabu search—part I. ORSA J Comput 1:190

Article
MATH
Google Scholar

Eskandar H, Sadollah A, Bahreininejad A, Hamdi M (2012) Water cycle algorithm—a novel metaheuristic optimization method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems. Comput Struct 110–111:151–166

Article
Google Scholar

Bayraktar Z, Komurcu M, Werner DH (2010) Wind driven optimization (WDO): a novel nature-inspired optimization algorithm and its application to electromagnetics, no 1, pp 0–3

Gupta S, Deep K (2018) PT US CR. Expert Syst Appl

Gupta S, Deep K (2018) Improved sine cosine algorithm with crossover scheme for global optimization.” Knowl-Based Syst

Gupta S, Deep K (2019) Enhanced leadership—inspired grey wolf optimizer for global optimization problems. Eng Comput, no 0123456789

Gupta S, Deep K (2019) Hybrid grey wolf optimizer with mutation operator. Springer, Singapore

Book
Google Scholar

Gupta S, Deep K (2020) A memory-based grey wolf optimizer for global optimization tasks. Appl Soft Comput J 93:106367

Article
Google Scholar

Xu Z, Hu Z, Heidari AA, Wang M, Zhao X, Chen H, Cai X (2020) Orthogonally-designed adapted grasshopper optimization: a comprehensive analysis. Expert Syst Appl 150:113282

Article
Google Scholar

Sattar D, Salim R (2020) A smart metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering problems. Eng Comput, no 0123456789

Banerjee N (2019) HC-PSOGWO: hybrid crossover oriented PSO and GWO based co-evolution for global optimization, vol 7, pp 3–8

Shahrouzi M, Salehi A (2020) Imperialist competitive learner-based optimization: a hybrid method to solve engineering problems. Iran Univ Sci Technol 10(1):155–180

Google Scholar

Herwan M, Mustaffa Z, Mawardi M, Daniyal H (2020) Engineering applications of artificial intelligence barnacles mating optimizer: a new bio-inspired algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 87:103330

Article
Google Scholar

Faramarzi A, Heidarinejad M, Stephens B, Mirjalili S (2019) Equilibrium optimizer: a novel optimization algorithm. Knowl-Based Syst 191:105190

Article
Google Scholar

Muhammed DA, Saeed SAM, Rashid TA, Member I (2020) Improved algorithm fitness—dependent optimizer, vol XX

Panda N (2019) Improved spotted hyena optimizer with space transformational search for training pi-sigma higher order neural network, pp 1–31

Fan Q, Chen Z, Li Z, Xia Z, Yu J, Wang D (2020) A new improved whale optimization algorithm with joint search mechanisms for high-dimensional global optimization problems. Eng Comput, 0123456789

Chen H, Wang M, Zhao X (2020) A multi-strategy enhanced sine cosine algorithm for global optimization and constrained practical engineering problems. Appl Math Comput 369:124872

MathSciNet
MATH
Google Scholar

Yimit A, Iigura K, Hagihara Y (2020) Refined selfish herd optimizer for global optimization problems. Expert Syst Appl 139:112838

Article
Google Scholar

Kamboj VK, Nandi A, Bhadoria A, Sehgal S (2019) An intensify Harris Hawks optimizer for numerical and engineering optimization problems. Appl Soft Comput J 89:106018

Article
Google Scholar

Zhao W, Wang L (2019) Artificial ecosystem-based optimization: a novel nature-inspired meta-heuristic algorithm, vol 0123456789. Springer, London

Google Scholar

2019_I-GWO and Ex-GWO.pdf

Khatri A, Gaba A, Vineet KPSR (2019) A novel life choice-based optimizer. Soft Comput, 0123456789

2019_Multi-objective heat transfer search algorithm.pdf

Wang R, Wang J (2019) Simplified salp swarm algorithm. In: 2019 IEEE international conference on artificial intelligence and computer applications, pp 226–230

Chen X, Tianfield H, Li K (2019) Self-adaptive differential artificial bee colony algorithm for global optimization problems. Swarm Evol Comput 45:70–91

Article
Google Scholar

Deka D, Datta D (2019) Optimization of unit commitment problem with ramp-rate constraint and wrap-around scheduling. Electr Power Syst Res 177:105948

Article
Google Scholar

Singh HP, Brar YS, Kothari DP (2019) Solution of optimal power flow based on combined active and reactive cost using particle swarm. Int J Electr Eng Technol 10(2):98–107

Google Scholar

Bhadoria A, Marwaha S, Kumar V (2019) An optimum forceful generation scheduling and unit commitment of thermal power system using sine cosine algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 8

Srikanth K, Panwar LK, Panigrahi BK, Herrera-Viedma E, Sangaiah AK, Wang GG (2018) Unit commitment problem solution in power system using a new meta-heuristic framework: quantum inspired binary grey wolf optimizer

Premrudeepreechacharn S, Siritaratiwat A (2019) Unit commitment problem, pp 1–23

Bhadoria A, Kamboj VK (2018) Optimal generation scheduling and dispatch of thermal generating units considering impact of wind penetration using hGWO-RES algorithm. Appl Intell

Ramu M, Srinivas LR, Kalyani ST (2017) Gravitational search algorithm for solving unit, vol 5, no Xi, pp 1497–1502

Selvakumar K, Vijayakumar K, Sattianadan D, Boopathi CS (2016) Shuffled frog leaping algorithm (SFLA) for short term optimal scheduling of thermal units with emission limitation and prohibited operational zone (POZ) constraints, vol 9

Shukla A, Singh SN (2016) Multi-objective unit commitment using search space-based crazy particle swarm optimisation and normal boundary intersection technique, vol 10, pp 1222–1231

Saravanan B, Kumar C, Kothari DP (2016) Electrical power and energy systems a solution to unit commitment problem using fire works algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 77:221–227

Article
Google Scholar

Kumar V, Bath KSK (2015) Hybrid HS—random search algorithm considering ensemble and pitch violation for unit commitment problem. Neural Comput Appl 28(5):1123–1148

Google Scholar

Shukla A, Singh SN (2016) Advanced three-stage pseudo-inspired weight-improved crazy particle swarm optimization for unit commitment problem. Energy 96:23–36

Article
Google Scholar

Khorramdel H, Membe S, Aghaei J, Member S, Khorramdel B (2015) Optimal battery sizing in microgrids using probabilistic unit commitment. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 3203(c):1–11

Google Scholar

Xing H, Cheng H, Zhang L (2015) Demand response based and wind farm integrated economic dispatch. CSEE J Power Energy Syst 1(4):37–41

Article
Google Scholar

Kamboj VK, Bath SK, Dhillon JS (2017) A novel hybrid DE–random search approach for unit commitment problem. Neural Comput. Appl 28(7):1559–1581

Article
Google Scholar

Kamboj VK (2015) A novel hybrid PSO–GWO approach for unit commitment problem. Neural Comput. Appl. 27(6):1643–1655

Article
Google Scholar

Casolino GM, Liuzzi G, Losi A (2015) Electrical power and energy systems combined cycle unit commitment in a changing electricity market scenario. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 73:114–123

Article
Google Scholar

Quan H, Srinivasan D, Khambadkone AM, Khosravi A (2015) A computational framework for uncertainty integration in stochastic unit commitment with intermittent renewable energy sources. Appl Energy 152:71–82

Article
Google Scholar

Zhang N, Hu Z, Han X, Zhang J, Zhou Y (2015) Electrical power and energy systems a fuzzy chance-constrained program for unit commitment problem considering demand response, electric vehicle and wind power. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 65:201–209

Article
Google Scholar

Singhal PK, Naresh R, Sharma V (2015) A modified binary artificial bee colony algorithm for ramp rate constrained unit commitment problem. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 25(12):3472–3491

Article
Google Scholar

Anita JM, Raglend IJ (2014) Multi objective combined emission constrained unit commitment problem using improved shuffled frog leaping algorithm Vindhya Group of Institutions mathematical modeling of emission constrained UC and, vol 13, pp 560–574

Ji B, Yuan X, Li X, Huang Y, Li W (2014) Application of quantum-inspired binary gravitational search algorithm for thermal unit commitment with wind power integration. Energy Convers Manag 87:589–598

Article
Google Scholar

Marko Č, Volkanovski A (2015) Engineering applications of artificial intelligence multi-objective unit commitment with introduction of a methodology for probabilistic assessment of generating capacities availability. Eng Appl Artif Intell 37:236–249

Article
Google Scholar

Gharegozi A, Jahani R (2013) A new approach for solving the unit commitment problem by cuckoo search algorithm. Indian J Sci Technol 6(9):5235–5241

Article
Google Scholar

Marko C (2013) Electrical power and energy systems a new model for optimal generation scheduling of power system considering generation units availability. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 47:129–139

Article
Google Scholar

Todosijevi R, Crévits I (2012) VNS based heuristic for solving the unit commitment problem. Electron Notes Discrete Math 39:153–160

Article
MATH
Google Scholar

Anita JM, Raglend IJ, Kothari DP (2012) Solution of unit commitment problem using shuffled frog leaping algorithm, vol 1, no 4, pp 9–26

Saurabh S, Ahmed M (2018) Optimization method for unit commitment in high-level wind generation and solar power. Springer, Singapore

Book
Google Scholar

Safari A, Shahsavari H (2018) Frequency-constrained unit commitment problem with considering dynamic ramp rate limits in the presence of wind power generation. Neural Comput Appl 0123456789

Varghese MP, Amudha A (2018) Artificial bee colony and cuckoo search algorithm for cost estimation with wind power energy, pp 1–8

Govardhan M, Roy R, Govardhan M, Roy R (2016) Electric power components and systems comparative analysis of economic viability with distributed energy resources on unit commitment comparative analysis of economic viability with distributed energy resources on unit commitment, vol 5008

Navin NK (2016) A modified differential evolution approach to PHEV integrated thermal unit commitment problem

Wang W, Li C, Liao X, Qin H (2017) Study on unit commitment problem considering pumped storage and renewable energy via a novel binary artificial sheep algorithm. Appl Energy 187:612–626

Article
Google Scholar

Banumalar K, Manikandan BV, Chandrasekaran K (2016) Security constrained unit commitment problem employing artificial computational intelligence for wind-thermal power system

Govardhan M, Roy R (2015) Electrical power and energy systems economic analysis of unit commitment with distributed energy resources. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 71:1–14

Article
Google Scholar

Osório GJ, Lujano-rojas JM, Matias JCO, Catalão JPS (2015) Electrical power and energy systems a new scenario generation-based method to solve the unit commitment problem with high penetration of renewable energies. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 64:1063–1072

Article
Google Scholar

Ming Z, Kun Z, Liang W (2014) Electrical power and energy systems study on unit commitment problem considering wind power and pumped hydro energy storage. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 63:91–96

Article
Google Scholar

Scholar PG (2013) LR-PSO method of generation scheduling problem for thermal-wind-solar energy system in deregulated power system

Maghsudlu S, Mohammadi S (2018) Optimal scheduled unit commitment considering suitable power of electric vehicle and optimal scheduled unit commitment considering suitable power of electric vehicle and photovoltaic uncertainty. J Renew Sustain Energy 10(4):043705

Article
Google Scholar

Shahbazitabar M, Abdi H (2018) A novel priority-based stochastic unit commitment considering renewable energy sources and parking lot cooperation. Energy 161:308–324

Article
Google Scholar

Rahiman F, Mohd P, Othman F, Ottukuloth S (2018) Power station scheduling with energy storage. J Inst Eng Ser B 100(1):77–83

Google Scholar

Ma K, Hu S, Yang J, Xu X, Guan X (2017) Appliances scheduling via cooperative multi-swarm PSO under day-ahead prices and photovoltaic generation. Appl Soft Comput J 62:504–513

Article
Google Scholar

Quan H, Srinivasan D, Khosravi A (2016) Integration of renewable generation uncertainties into stochastic unit commitment considering reserve and risk: a comparative study. Energy 103:735–745

Article
Google Scholar

Abujarad SY, Mustafa MW, Jamian JJ (2017) Recent approaches of unit commitment in the presence of intermittent renewable energy resources: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 70:215–223

Article
Google Scholar

Selvakumar K, Vignesh B, Boopathi CS, Kannan T (2016) Thermal unit commitment strategy integrated with solar energy system. Int J Appl Eng Res 11(9):6856–6860

Google Scholar

Jasmin EA, Ahamed TI, Remani T (2016) A function approximation approach to reinforcement learning for solving unit commitment problem with photo voltaic sources

Chandrasekaran K, Simon SP (2012) Binary/real coded particle swarm optimization for unit commitment problem, no 3

Senjyu T, Chakraborty S, Saber AY, Toyama H, Yona A (2008) Thermal unit commitment strategy with solar and wind energy systems using genetic algorithm operated particle swarm optimization, no PECon 08, pp 866–871

Chandrasekaran K, Simon SP, Prasad N (2014) Electrical power and energy systems SCUC problem for solar/thermal power system addressing smart grid issues using FF algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 62:450–460

Article
Google Scholar

Anita JM, Raglend IJ (2013) Solution of emission constrained unit commitment problem using shuffled frog leaping algorithm. In: 2013 international conference on circuits, power and computing technologies (ICCPCT), pp 93–98

Kamboj VK, Bath SK, Dhillon JS (2016) Implementation of hybrid harmony/random search algorithm considering ensemble and pitch violation for unit commitment problem. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 77:228–249

Article
Google Scholar