Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of various passive island detection technique

From: A narrative perspective of island detection methods under the lens of cyber-attack in data-driven smart grid

Technique

Advantage

Drawback

Speed

DG network type

DG system

Detection time

References

ROCOP

Short detection time

Very high NDZ

Faster than OV/UV and OF/UF

Radial

NA

26 µs

[44]

ROCOF

Short detection time, able to differentiate between islanding and non-islanding scenario effectively

Very high NDZ

Faster than OF/UF

Radial

Synchronous

0.5–0.7 µs

[45,46,47]

Phase Jump Detection

Short detection time

High NDZ

Low

Radial

Inverter-based

0.1 s

[48]

Rate of Change of Frequency over Power

Detect island quickly and can differentiate between islanding and non-islanding scenario accurately

Moderate NDZ

Faster than OV/UV and OF/UF

Small-scale radial

Synchronous

0.2–0.3 s

[50, 51]

Rate of change in voltage and change in power factor

Low NDZ

High cost

Fast

Radial

Two synchronous distributed generation

0.5 s

[52]

Change in impedance

Detect island quickly

High NDZ

Faster than ROCOF

Small-scale radial

Synchronous

0.5 s

[53]

Over/under voltage, over/under frequency

Moderate NDZ

High NDZ

low

Radial

Synchronous

0.2–0.4 s

[49, 54, 55]