Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison results of 33 bus system

From: Butterfly optimizer assisted Max–Min based multi-objective approach for optimal connection of DGs and optimal network reconfiguration of distribution networks

Method DGs sizes in kW/BUS/ p.f % DG kW or kVA % PLR %MLI
Scenario-1/ Power loss Minimization / Initial Configured Network
Proposed BO algorithm (1044/24/0.88), (1156/30/0.8), (737/14/0.88) NA 93.95 NA
HTLBO-GWO [18] (997/30/0.86), (1000/13/0.81), (789/24/0.87) NA 93.51 NA
HAS-PABC [17] (862/12/0.85), (1159/30/0.85), (816/25/0.85) NA 92.45 NA
Scenario-1/ Power loss Minimization / Optimal Reconfigured Network
Proposed BO algorithm (414/33/0.92), (573/12/0.88), (1520/29/0.8) NA 91.11 NA
UVDA Method [25] (1.125 + j1.034/30), (0.592 + j0.252/15)
(0.526 + j0.280/12)
NA 87.98 NA
Scenario-1/ Loadability Maximization / Initial Configured Network
Proposed BO algorithm (1832/31/0.8), (550/17/1), (792/14/0.82) NA NA 50
HPSO Algorithm [29] (377/29/0.85), (1160/15/0.85), (1677/31/0.85) NA NA 48.23
Scenario-2/Power loss Minimization / Initial Configured Network
Proposed BO algorithm (556/14/0.8), (500/25/0.8), (913/30/0.8) %56.31 KVA/% 53.01 kW 88.76 NA
BSOA algorithm (698/13/0.86), (402/29/0.71), (658/31/0.7) % 50 kW 85.94 NA
Scenario-2/ Loadability Maximization / Initial Configured Network
Proposed BO algorithm (505/16/0.8), (543/18/0.8), (1102/32/0.8) %57.87 kW/
% 61.51 kVA
NA 39.18
HPSO Algorithm [29] (583/14/0.85), (583,18,0.85), (583,32,0.85) % 40 kW NA 26.76