Table 5 Comparison results of 33 bus system
Method | DGs sizes in kW/BUS/ p.f | % DG kW or kVA | % PLR | %MLI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Scenario-1/ Power loss Minimization / Initial Configured Network | ||||
Proposed BO algorithm | (1044/24/0.88), (1156/30/0.8), (737/14/0.88) | NA | 93.95 | NA |
HTLBO-GWO [18] | (997/30/0.86), (1000/13/0.81), (789/24/0.87) | NA | 93.51 | NA |
HAS-PABC [17] | (862/12/0.85), (1159/30/0.85), (816/25/0.85) | NA | 92.45 | NA |
Scenario-1/ Power loss Minimization / Optimal Reconfigured Network | ||||
Proposed BO algorithm | (414/33/0.92), (573/12/0.88), (1520/29/0.8) | NA | 91.11 | NA |
UVDA Method [25] | (1.125 + j1.034/30), (0.592 + j0.252/15) (0.526 + j0.280/12) | NA | 87.98 | NA |
Scenario-1/ Loadability Maximization / Initial Configured Network | ||||
Proposed BO algorithm | (1832/31/0.8), (550/17/1), (792/14/0.82) | NA | NA | 50 |
HPSO Algorithm [29] | (377/29/0.85), (1160/15/0.85), (1677/31/0.85) | NA | NA | 48.23 |
Scenario-2/Power loss Minimization / Initial Configured Network | ||||
Proposed BO algorithm | (556/14/0.8), (500/25/0.8), (913/30/0.8) | %56.31 KVA/% 53.01 kW | 88.76 | NA |
BSOA algorithm | (698/13/0.86), (402/29/0.71), (658/31/0.7) | % 50 kW | 85.94 | NA |
Scenario-2/ Loadability Maximization / Initial Configured Network | ||||
Proposed BO algorithm | (505/16/0.8), (543/18/0.8), (1102/32/0.8) | %57.87 kW/ % 61.51 kVA | NA | 39.18 |
HPSO Algorithm [29] | (583/14/0.85), (583,18,0.85), (583,32,0.85) | % 40 kW | NA | 26.76 |