Table 2 Comparative analysis of three-phase transmission line parameters for inductance/length (mH)
From: Parameters estimation of AC transmission line by an improved moth flame optimization method
Case Number | IMFO | MFO | MWOA [36] | GWO [37] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Test Case 4 | 0.00725 | 0.05453 | −0.00033 | 0.1128 |
1.25000 | 1.23000 | 1.01000 | 0.02587 | |
1.25000 | −1.23000 | 1.01000 | −0.00084 | |
−1.25000 | −1.23000 | −0.00775 | − 0.03310 | |
−1.25000 | 1.23000 | 1.01 | −0.01074 | |
Best optimal value | ||||
0.65055 | 0.65157 | 0.66063 | 0.78216 | |
Test Case 5 | 0.00782 | −0.01721 | 0.08447 | 0.00164 |
2.20000 | 2.10000 | 0.07832 | 0.00040 | |
2.20000 | −2.10000 | 1.17590 | −0.00914 | |
2.20000 | −2.10000 | 0.31235 | −1.69450 | |
2.20000 | 2.10000 | 0.06741 | 0.00002 | |
Best optimal value | ||||
0.41258 | 0.42763 | 0.42000 | 0.43000 | |
Test Case 6 | 1.20000 | −1.10000 | −1.10000 | 1.00000 |
−1.20000 | −1.10000 | −1.10000 | −1.00000 | |
−1.20000 | 1.10000 | −1.09040 | −1.00000 | |
−1.20000 | 1.10000 | −1.10000 | − 0.38073 | |
1.2 | −1.10000 | −1.10000 | 0.00766 | |
Best optimal value | ||||
−0.76593 | −0.66622 | −0.66622 | − 0.57457 | |