Table 7 Results of proposed method for different network configuration cases

1

1

1

1

1

2

0.8372

0.8372

0.8372

0.8372

3

0.7496

0.7496

0.7496

0.7496

4

0.7254

0.6734

0.6734

0.7254

5

0.7244

0.6351

0.6351

0.7244

6

0.83

0.83

0.83

0.83

7

0.8272

0.8272

0.8272

0.8272

8

0.8286

0.8286

0.8286

0.8286

9

0.8349

0.8349

0.8349

0.8349

10

0.834

0.834

0.834

0.834

11

0.7447

0.7447

0.7447

0.6899

12

0.7422

0.7422

0.7422

0.6419

13

0.7412

0.7412

0.7412

0.614

14

0.7185

0.6694

0.6694

0.7185

15

0.717

0.6681

0.6681

0.717

22

0.6221

0.5941

0.6064

0.6296

23

0.6072

0.6004

0.6128

0.6575

24

0.6239

0.618

0.6288

0.736

25

0.6115

0.611

0.6167

0.7098

26

0.6164

0.5892

0.6014

0.6055

27

0.6142

0.5873

0.5994

0.6041

28

0.6153

0.5882

0.6004

0.6003

29

0.6551

0.5925

0.6047

0.6288

30

0.6999

0.5919

0.6041

0.6285

31

0.6036

0.5969

0.6092

0.6564

32

0.6018

0.5951

0.6075

0.6559

33

0.6011

0.5945

0.6068

0.6557

34

0.613

0.6128

0.6181

0.7098

35

0.6268

0.6178

0.6316

0.7477