Table 13 Cost and computation time comparison of optimization results in case 3
Method | Pop size | Iteration | Best cost ($) | Mean cost ($) | Worst cost ($) | Computation time (min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposed method | 50 | 13 | 1,015,438.967 | 1,016,235.527 | 1,017,983.495 | 1.79 |
SaANS–SDP with VRS [38] | 240 | – | 1,041,100 | 1,044,300 | 1,047,140 | – |
MVMO–SH [34] | – | – | 1,015,903 | – | – | 2.8 |
ADE–SA [35] | – | – | 1,016,412.81 | – | – | 1.805 |
MILP–IPM [28] | – | – | 1,016,311 | – | – | 0.08 |
FA–PSOTVAC [27] | 50 | 200 | 1,024,163 | 1,794,400 | 13,793,000 | 8.4934 |
BBOSB [29] | – | – | 1,017,530.3328 | 1,018,487.8504 | 1,019,954.8584 | – |
HIGA [25] | – | – | 1,018,473.380 | 1,019,328.460 | 1,022,283.542 | 3.53 |
LDISS-2 [24] | 50 | 30 | 1,018,166 | 1,019,344 | 1,020,030 | 9.25 |
Hybrid GSA–SQP [22] | – | 6000 | 1,027,247.78 | – | – | 5.21 |
Hybrid DE [19] | – | – | 1,031,077 | – | – | – |
EPSO–GM [33] | 20 | 20,000 | 1,023,691.11 | 1,026,034.14 | 1,029,736.00 | |
Hybrid PSO–SQP [17] | – | – | 1,027,334 | – | – | 18.12 |